I've got the feeling that the scores I've got don't reflect the level itself but the sole disappointment of the players for a too-short-for-their-taste level. In that case, reviews don't seem to be objective as they don't take into account what the level tries to be. I've tried to make a race level for speed game players (I thought there were some) while still getting a beautiful setting for 'standard' players, but it's not in any case a 'standard' level. If unconventional level are going to be reviewed like any other conventional level, then the point is missed. I know that every player enjoy the game the way they want, but in my opinion reviews should keep some objectivity.
I'd like to know the opinion of others about this subject.
I'd prefer my level not to be reviewed at all (and existing reviews to be deleted or hidden) than getting comments about what my level isn't.

Thank you
